dxy logo
首页丁香园病例库全部版块
搜索
登录

理解的对吗?

发布于 2020-07-30 · 浏览 1271 · IP 江苏江苏
这个帖子发布于 4 年零 284 天前,其中的信息可能已发生改变或有所发展。

Limited availability of hand hygiene supplies, their improper/inconvenient placement, work overload, pressure, skin reactions, diminished risk perception, habit of not washing hands and forgetfulness are associated with low compliance, while importance of social influence, attitude towards hand hygiene and role models are important promoters . Hand hygiene is scarcely perceived as a communal responsibility and healthcare workers disacknowledge hand hygiene as ‘duty of care towards their patient’ but acknowledge hand hygiene as ‘duty of care towards themselves’. Such perceptions may directly influence the frequency of hand hygiene actions . Very recently, analysis of an extensive intensive care unit dataset revealed, that hand hygiene actions are likelier to be performed after contaminating tasks as compared to before critical tasks, suggesting the strongest prompt for hand hygiene being ‘disgust’. Self-protection appears as a strong driver and false belief of protection (i.e. use of gloves) as impairer to perform hand hygiene in various other studies conducted in different settings and countries . In addition, type and amount of product used, rubbing technique and consistency of use are known to influence compliance.


手卫生用品供应有限、放置不当/不方便、工作负荷过大、压力大、使用手卫生用品后皮肤反应、对HAIs风险认知不足、不习惯洗手和健忘都与低依从性有关,而社会对个人的影响、个人对手卫生的态度和榜样的力量能促进手卫生习惯的养成。手卫生很少被认为是一项公共责任,医护人员否认手卫生是“对病人的义务”,但承认手卫生是“对自己的义务”。这种看法可能直接影响了执行手卫生的频率。最近,对重症监护病房一个大样本数据采集的分析显示:与在执行危急任务之前相比,手卫生更有可能在执行污染任务之后进行,这表明执行手卫生最强烈的提示是“厌恶”。在不同环境和国家进行的各种其他研究中,自我保护似乎是一种强烈需求,错误地认为保护(即使用手套)会破坏手卫生。此外,手卫生用品的类型和数量、搽拭技术和使用的一致性会影响依从性。

这句话理解的对吗?总觉得前言不搭后语

最后编辑于 2022-10-09 · 浏览 1271

8 收藏点赞

全部讨论0

默认最新
avatar
8
分享帖子
share-weibo分享到微博
share-weibo分享到微信
认证
返回顶部