【有奖征集】SCI投稿全过程（外语版长期有效）！
发布于 2009-01-07 · 浏览 3.7 万 · IP 江苏江苏
这个帖子发布于 16 年零 127 天前，其中的信息可能已发生改变或有所发展。
推荐【有奖征集】SCI投稿全过程（外语版长期有效）！
国人投SCI，语言总是个难关，但也有很多成功人士，这里征集你们成功的过程，从中得到学习，把你成功投稿的过程：从你的投稿信、审稿人和主编的建议、你的修回信件，整个过程相关文件，按以下格式把它贴在下面的一个帖子里，我们就会给你加1分，如果把修前和修后的文献也作为附件上传（如附件太大，可上传至其它共享空间），我们就会给你加2分，如果是10分以上的SCI，我们加分翻倍(如为10分以上请自行注明备查)！
【论文题名】Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R,Goedert M. Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 1997; 388:839-840.
【投稿信】
Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
【审稿人意见】
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
【主编意见】
1. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
2. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
【修回信件】
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.
【录用信件】
国人投SCI，语言总是个难关，但也有很多成功人士，这里征集你们成功的过程，从中得到学习，把你成功投稿的过程：从你的投稿信、审稿人和主编的建议、你的修回信件，整个过程相关文件，按以下格式把它贴在下面的一个帖子里，我们就会给你加1分，如果把修前和修后的文献也作为附件上传（如附件太大，可上传至其它共享空间），我们就会给你加2分，如果是10分以上的SCI，我们加分翻倍(如为10分以上请自行注明备查)！
【论文题名】Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R,Goedert M. Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 1997; 388:839-840.
【投稿信】
Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
Yours sincerely
【审稿人意见】
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
【主编意见】
1. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
2. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
【修回信件】
1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.
【录用信件】
最后编辑于 2009-01-14 · 浏览 3.7 万
109 401 12
