几个单词理解的对吗？

The field of interventional pulmonology is an exciting discipline with a versatile and sophisticated armamentarium of procedures to manage tracheal stenosis and complicated central airways. Rigid bronchoscopy serves as the backbone of therapeutic bronchoscopic procedures, allowing for the application of various procedures ranging from mechanical debulking to thermal ablation. However, there are no clear data assessing the long-term efficacy of bronchoscopic treatment in benign tracheal disease, the efficacy of different bronchoscopic treatment modalities, and most importantly, how bronchoscopic methods compare to surgical resection. Subsequently, consensus on how these inherently complex and morbid conditions are treated continues to evolve. Additionally, the availability and the interplay of interventional pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, ENT surgeons, and anesthesiologists remain varied. Although there are few studies investigating the efficacy of tracheal resection and reconstruction in benign tracheal stenosis, surgery should remain one of the long-term therapeutic modalities available to all patients with either severe benign tracheal stenosis or recurrent tracheal stenosis despite bronchoscopic interventions. Despite the lack of a standardized approach, interventional pulmonary procedures remain a cornerstone for patients who cannot tolerate surgery due to comorbidities, who have unfavorable anatomy for safe surgical resection, and who have symptomatic non-severe disease.

介入肺病学是一门令人振奋的学科，拥有多种多样和成熟的设备流程来管理气管狭窄和复杂的中央气道。硬质支气管镜下操作作为治疗性支气管镜操作的支柱，可行从机械消除到热消融的各种手术。但目前尚无明确数据评估支气管镜在治疗良性气管疾病中的远期疗效、不同支气管镜治疗方式的疗效，最重要的是，支气管镜下操作与手术切除如何进行比较。随后，关于如何治疗这些固有复杂的疾病和疾病所致的气管狭窄的共识在不断演变。此外，是否有合格的介入肺科医生、胸外科医生、耳鼻喉科医生和麻醉科医师、及其这些医生间的相互配合仍各不相同。尽管很少有研究评估良性气管狭窄时气管切除和重建的有效性，但对于所有的重度良性气管狭窄或复发性气管狭窄患者，尽管有支气管镜干预，手术应仍是长期的治疗方式之一。尽管缺乏标准化方法，但对于因合并症不能耐受手术、解剖结构不利于安全手术切除和有症状但非重症患者，介入性肺手术仍然是治疗的基石。

versatile 通用的 还是 多种多样的？

sophisticated 复杂的还是成熟的？

debulking消除？

how如何？