理解的对吗？

A comprehensive approach to trauma airway management proposed by Gamberini et al. includes three pillars: operator experience, airway devices, and pharmacological choices (24). Based on a recent review of the literature, this multifaceted approach rather than focus on the procedure of intubation itself leads to improved overall outcomes. When endotracheal intubation is unsuccessful and advancing to surgical airway is considered, Schauer et al. found no difference in short-term outcomes between combat casualties managed with cricothyrotomy versus SGA (22). Significant airway burns and expanding neck hematomas may be among few conditions that warrant expedited escalation of airway interventions, as the lack of an anticipatory approach with early intervention can result in a failed airway.

Gamberini等人提出的创伤性气道管理的综合方法包括三大要素：操作者体验、气道设备和药物选择。基于最近的文献综述，这种多维度的方法而不只专注于插管过程本身改善了总体预后。当气管插管不成功，并考虑建立外科气道时，Schauer等研究者发现环甲切开术和SGA治疗的战斗伤员之间的短期预后没有差异。严重的气道烧伤和不断扩大的颈部血肿可能是少数需要加快气道干预升级的情况之一，因为早期干预措施若缺乏预见性就可能导致气道管理失败。

the lack of an anticipatory approach with early intervention理解的对吗？是不是先理解with early intervention，然后才是the lack of an anticipatory approach