为什么说图1只包括肌阵挛患者，而不含心脏骤停后幸存的患者？

Several other recent series have reported favorable outcomes in a larger proportion of patients with postcardiac arrest myoclonus (≅ 10%), including some that may have met criteria for status myoclonus [6–10]. These studies are not all included in Fig. 1, as they only included patients with myoclonus rather than a consecutive cohort of postcardiac arrest patients.

最近的其他几个系列研究报道了较大比例(≅ 10%)的心脏骤停后肌阵挛患者的良好预后，包括一些符合肌阵挛状态标准的患者。这些研究并不都包括在图1中，因为它们只包括肌阵挛患者，而不含心脏骤停后幸存的患者。

它们是不是就是指图1

Fig. 1 Summary of cohort studies (with author and year) in which specificity of myoclonus in predicting poor outcome following cardiac arrest could be calculated. Studies with an asterisk analyzed only patients who met criteria for status myoclonus. The summative specificity was 98% (95% CI 96–99%), but this was lower for studies that did not explicitly limit the analysis to status myoclonus (96%, 95% CI 93–97%). CI, confidence interval

图1队列研究总结(作者和年份)，可从中计算肌阵挛预测心脏骤停后不良预后的特异性。带星号的研究只分析了符合肌阵挛状态标准的患者。总结出特异性为98% (95%置信区间96–99%)，但对于未明确将分析局限于肌阵挛状态(96%，95%置信区间93–97%)的研究来说，这一置信区间的特异性较低。

为什么说图1只包括肌阵挛患者，而不含心脏骤停后幸存的患者。不是从图1中计算肌阵挛预测心脏骤停后不良预后的特异性吗？