【每日动态】抗生素和NSAID对急性支气管炎的咳嗽无效
Method
This was a single-blind,placebo-controlled, parallel group study conducted in nine primary care centresin Spain. The study assessed acute bronchitis, defined as a respiratoryinfection of less than 1week in duration with cough, discoloured sputum and at least oneother lower respiratory tract symptom, such as breathlessness, wheezing andchest pain and/or discomfort. Patients were aged 18–70years. The key exclusion criteriaincluded the presence of radiologically confirmed pneumonia; ‘severe illness’,according to the predefined clinical criteria; and a significant comorbidity(including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease andimmunosuppression). Patients were randomised to thrice-daily treatment groupsof either amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 500/125mg, ibuprofen 600mg or placebo for 10days. Patients were blind to the intervention. The primary outcomewas the number of days following randomisation that cough was still recorded bythe patient on a daily diary card. The power calculation determined aclinically significant change in the cough duration as a difference of 2days from placebo.
Findings
A total of 416 patients were randomisedinto the three treatment arms. Fifty-six per cent were women, while the meanage was 45.1years (withSD of 14.3). The overall mean duration of cough was 10days (95% CI 9 to 11). The meanduration for the ibuprofen group was 9days (95% CI 8 to 10), versus 11days for co-amoxiclav (95% CI 10 to 12) and 11 for placebo (95% CI 8to 14). A logrank test result was 0.25.
The overall absence of clear benefit wassimilar across adjusted models and various secondary outcomes, includingoverall symptom duration and a measure of ‘clinical success’. Adverse eventswere significantly more common in the antibiotic group (12%) compared with theibuprofen arm (5%) and patients receiving placebo (3%; p=0.008).
Commentary
This study adds to the weight of evidenceagainst using antibiotics for self-limiting acute bronchitis and also providesevidence that the use of NSAIDs will not reduce the duration of cough in thiscondition.
The most important limitation is theexclusion of patients with comorbidities, those aged over 70 and those inresidential care—groups presenting commonly and in whom, perhaps, any benefitmight be greatest. The usefulness of the complete absence of cough as theprimary endpoint is questionable. The duration of symptoms is likely importantto patients but a reduction in symptom intensity might also allow an earlierreturn to usual activity. Assessing symptoms is challenging, with overallburden representing a complex composite of severity and duration. Perhaps,also, the treatment was started too late; there was a 4-day average delaybetween the symptom onset and the start of therapy. Moreover, the authors notethat NSAIDs may be prescribed to reduce other symptoms such as chestdiscomfort—the decision not to collect data examining this perhaps represents amissed opportunity.
The study was single-blind, therefore theinvestigators were aware of the treatment allocation. This reflected theexpense of manufacturing identical preparations in investigator-led studies anddoes not appear to have led to bias, given the similar outcomes betweentreatment arms.
In conclusion, it is clear that antibioticsand NSAIDs should not be used routinely to treat cough in acute bronchitis inpatients under the age of 70 without comorbidity. That is not to downplay theimportance of such circumstances; there remains a real and urgent need todevelop effective therapies to reduce the burden of acute bronchitis and otherviral infections of the respiratory tract.