【讨论】编辑的权利有那么大吗？

年12月份向某杂志投了一篇文章，经过三个月的漫长等待，编辑给了一下回复：Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
高兴之余对文章进行了仔细的修改，在不到一个月的时间提交了修改稿，又等待了大约50天的时间后，编辑给了以下回复：
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. Their comments are included below. However, having regard to the pressure on space in ** and the subject matter covered by your MS I have decided that I cannot accept it for publication.

I wish you well with your research.

For your information, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

**
**
**

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: All changes were done and I suggest to accept this munscript for publication.

Reviewer #2:
My opinion about the Manuscript Number: AQUA-D-08-01565R1

1.  The manuscript in this form is better than the previous one.
2.  In line 73, "During the experiments," should be " During the experiment,"
3.  In line 64, "at 31-32%." should be "at 31-32? or ppt." as you have written in your response about the comment 12.
4.  In line 167, "that still gave" should be "that still giving or still give".
5.  In lines 202, 203, and 229, "the three test groups" should be "the three tested groups".
6.  In line 387, "requires" should be "require".
7.  Adding the final weight of **, will support this research.

几乎晕死，根本就是借口，如果是上面他说的两个据稿理由还需要等6个月的时间吗？什么编辑，垃圾都不如。