这篇SCI对小弟来说真的很重要，希望大家知道的，理解的能够给小弟帮助，万分感谢！！一经采用马上悬赏，额外再给悬赏！！谢谢！这是一篇关于三种术式治疗痔疮的网状Meta分析，下面是部分琢磨不透的修改意见：

意见1.I would simply state the use of the Cochrane tool rather than explicit the inclusion of 22 studies. This number should be stated in the RESULTS section.

第一点，实在琢磨不透编辑的意思，我原文的RESULTS部分关于Cochrane质量评价是这样写的，并在后面附上了REVMAN的质量评价图：

“The Corhrane Collaboration’s risk of bias assessment for the 22 RCTs is summarized in Fig.3.”

2.Please specify where and how did you perform the additional search that yielded one more article for inclusion (as shown in the PRISMA flowchart).

第二点，我琢磨不明白，第二点，意思是让我把每个数据库的检索式写下来吗？并且把每篇纳入的文章的地址附上去吗？    让我苦恼的是，我纳入了几篇中文的文献，那中文数据库的检索式也要翻译成成英文吗？实在琢磨不透

3.It would be nice to provide an individualized data for each study regarding the bias assessment. The overall reading is interesting, however the reader cannot make his own assessment of the relevance of each study.

第三点，审稿人是觉得图片太多了，现在处于可删可不删的情况，请问我是删掉一部分图片吗？还是维持原状。另外，审稿人是建议让我把这三种术式的图片放上去吗？

希望大家能够花点时间解答下小弟的困惑，实在琢磨不透啊，其他的意见都弄好了，就剩下这仨！

顶顶顶